How would $400-450 for a 200-300w linear sound?
I am building up such a linear amp 12w --> 200w on 2-30 MHz. If it tests out well, I am thinking their may be a market for this. I understand that the FCC has to accept the unit, but I wonder if it is only available as a kit if that applies? This is a 28-volt transistor so a 28 volt 20A supply is needed Two could be combined for up to 600w but would require 40w drive and a 40amp PS. No competition for the new 500w linear from Elecraft ------------------------------ Message: 44 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:50:25 -0500 From: "John Harper" <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] News from Visalia! (:-)) To: "Elecraft" <[hidden email]> Message-ID: <000501cadf06$7b260ed0$0301a8c0@JOHN> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Too rich for my blood for 500w..... >A number I heard was $2000., but I have to admit, I don't recall who >said it. John Harper AE5X http://www.ae5x.com/blog 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 ====================================== BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010 DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email] ====================================== ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I am building up such a linear amp 12w --> 200w on 2-30 MHz.
If it tests out well, I am thinking their may be a market for this. I understand that the FCC has to accept the unit, but I wonder if it is only available as a kit if that applies? This is a 28-volt transistor so a 28 volt 20A supply is needed>>> Kits and parts kits, even when incomplete, have to be certified. For some reason the FCC has allowed the CCI kits to slip by but even at Heathkit, once type acceptance came into play, things had to go past the FCC. It's a big deal to do a certification filing. Just follow the rules outlined by the FCC. Gain limit is 15 dB, there are harmonic and spurious specs, and no amplification or easy modification for operation between 26-28 MHz. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Is there some obvious reason why the FCC chose 15dB as the gain limit?
73 jim ab3cv ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Edward R Cole
While I don't have any desire for a KPA500, I am EXTREMELY happy that it is
in the pipeline because I can continue holding out hope that Elecraft's R&D continues on a KPA1500...which is the one I can't wait to buy. My pair of Alpha 76CAs are getting long in the tooth and if the KPA500 sells like hotcakes it will generate enough cash flow to fund completion of the KPA1500 project (I hope). Bob K5WA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jim AB3CV
Jim -
I believe it was to make CB amps illegal and unprofitable. Also, Ham amps were not permitted to operate on 10 meters for the same reason - to make them unattractive to CB operators. Monty K2DLJ > Is there some obvious reason why the FCC chose 15dB as the gain limit? > > 73 > > jim ab3cv ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jim AB3CV
The 15 dB gain limitation made more sense when Part 97.317 included a
companion restriction of requiring not less than 50-watts drive power to attain the amp's rated output power. If a Part 95 user had the wherewithal to somehow modify a recently manufactured QRP-input type amp, 15 dB still places a 4W Part 95 transceiver at roughly 140-watts AM, 400W SSB (Part 95.410). Part 97.317(a)(3) already states: "no amplification (0 dB gain) between 26 MHz and 28 MHz." I believe the gain restriction could be dispensed with, and the remaining sections of 97.317 kept intact -- and little detriment would occur. As to HF amp kits requiring certification, I see no dispositive section in the CFR that affirmatively compels certification of a kit for use in Part 97 service. Section 97.315 clearly discusses "manufactured and imported" amplifiers -- kits are not specifically included in the rule. However, there may be relevant case law on the matter that backs up the CFR -- and the FCC may have invoked internal policy decisions in the past, but someone could create an argument that if the FCC had wanted to compel certification of HF amp kits, they could have easily done so and that requirement should have been implemented as a matter of procedure under the APA. The argument can be further bolstered under Part 97.315(a)(1) which states amplifier certification is not required if: "...the amplifier is constructed or modified by an amateur radio operator for use at an amateur station." Does the term "construction" mean home-brew only with parts secured on-hand and through multiple vendors? Or, does construction also mean "in kit form," where the parts are consolidated for sale? The question is then: how does one interpret the exact rule of law? The "in kit form" term could have been easily defined and included in Sections 97.315 and 2.815, but it isn't. If the government intends to prohibit something that's simple to read and interpret, they need to codify it in a rule and not leave it to guess work. Other means to get the FCC's position on the matter can take the form of form of a Declaratory Ruling or Advisory Opinion. Paul, W9AC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Miller" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] News from Visalia! > Is there some obvious reason why the FCC chose 15dB as the gain limit? > > 73 > > jim ab3cv > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
Kits for sale by are specifically -included- in the FCC certification
requirements. 73, Eric WA6HHQ ---- On 4/19/2010 7:50 AM, Paul Christensen wrote: > As to HF amp kits requiring certification, I see no dispositive section in > the CFR that affirmatively compels certification of a kit for use in Part 97 > service. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Eric:
The term "kit" has indeed been omitted from the rule. I had to take another look at the rule and track the changes of the CFR. Before mid-2006, Section 2.815(b) had read: "(b) After April 27, 1978, no person shall manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any external radio frequency power amplifier or amplifier *kit* capable of operation on any frequency or frequencies between 24 and 35 MHz." Then, in 2006, in addition to other changes affecting the rule, the word "kit" was omitted and as of today, Section 2.815(b) reads:"(b) No person shall manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease including advertising for sale or lease) or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any external radio frequency power amplifier capable of operation on any frequency or frequencies below 144 MHz unless the amplifier has received a grant of certification in accordance with subpart J of this part and other relevant parts of this chapter..."That said, want to start offering the KPA500 as a kit? <g>. Paul, W9AC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <[hidden email]> To: "Paul Christensen" <[hidden email]> Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:44 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] News from Visalia! > Kits for sale by are specifically -included- in the FCC certification > requirements. > > 73, Eric WA6HHQ > ---- > > > On 4/19/2010 7:50 AM, Paul Christensen wrote: >> As to HF amp kits requiring certification, I see no dispositive section >> in >> the CFR that affirmatively compels certification of a kit for use in Part >> 97 >> service. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
Yup - I read the same section again this morning. My discussions with
them have indicated that they now consider 'amplifier', as referred to on their rules, to encompass any amplifier - kit or built. We'll be offering the KPA-500 both ways. (FCC Certified.) 73, Eric WA6HHQ ==== On 4/19/2010 11:00 AM, Paul Christensen wrote: > Eric: > > The term "kit" has indeed been omitted from the rule. I had to take another > look at the rule and track the changes of the CFR. Before mid-2006, Section > 2.815(b) had read: > > "(b) After April 27, 1978, no person shall manufacture, sell or lease, offer > for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or > lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing > or offering for sale or lease, any external radio frequency > power amplifier or amplifier *kit* capable of operation on any frequency or > frequencies between 24 and 35 MHz." > Then, in 2006, in addition to other changes affecting the rule, the word > "kit" was omitted and as of today, Section 2.815(b) reads:"(b) No person > shall manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease > including advertising for sale or lease) or import, ship or distribute for > the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any > external radio frequency power amplifier capable of operation on any > frequency or frequencies below 144 MHz unless the amplifier has received a > grant of certification in accordance with subpart J of this part and other > relevant parts of this chapter..."That said, want to start offering the > KPA500 as a kit?<g>. Paul, W9AC > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" > <[hidden email]> > To: "Paul Christensen"<[hidden email]> > Cc: "Elecraft Reflector"<[hidden email]> > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] News from Visalia! > > > >> Kits for sale by are specifically -included- in the FCC certification >> requirements. >> >> 73, Eric WA6HHQ >> ---- >> >> >> On 4/19/2010 7:50 AM, Paul Christensen wrote: >> >>> As to HF amp kits requiring certification, I see no dispositive section >>> in >>> the CFR that affirmatively compels certification of a kit for use in Part >>> 97 >>> service. >>> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Edward R Cole
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |